if this is up and running, I'd sure like to buy a 900 Mhz modem and get the HamWan a bit farther into Mason County. Any suggestions? -- Stan KF7LTT Spams/Scams Forwarded To WA State Attorney For Prosecution.
It's only deployed @ Gold Mtn. It doesn't work very far, due to the low gain nature of 900MHz antennas and only using 1/2 W transmitter. Feel free to link to it @ 915MHz with 5MHz channel-width. You'll need the Mikrotik 9HPn modem and a vpol antenna of some kind. More gain the better. --Bart On 12/14/2017 5:08 PM, Stan wrote:
if this is up and running, I'd sure like to buy a 900 Mhz modem and get the HamWan a bit farther into Mason County.
Any suggestions?
It's been a couple years since I asked about 900 MHz. Has there been any change in the status at Gold Mtn?
It's only deployed @ Gold Mtn. It doesn't work very far, due to the low gain nature of 900MHz antennas and only using 1/2 W transmitter. Feel free to link to it @ 915MHz with 5MHz channel-width. You'll need the Mikrotik 9HPn modem and a vpol antenna of some kind. More gain the better.
Thanks, Bill
Gold's 900 is up and running - in fact we were just debating it a bit on the list a week or so ago, discussing whether anyone was actively using it and/or interested in experimenting with it, or whether to scrap it and take it offline. Mikrotik no longer makes a radio to use 900, so if we want to work with it we'll have to look at alternatives. There's a MT baseboard with a ubiquity daughterboard that Spokane folks are using we can look at. What is your interest in 900 and where would you like to see it go? I think the project has some value for some of the non-LOS sites at a lower data rate, but do we have enough people interested to make it worth the effort is the question? Cheers, Rob -----Original Message----- From: PSDR [mailto:psdr-bounces@hamwan.org] On Behalf Of Bill Vodall Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 7:47 PM To: Puget Sound Data Ring Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz It's been a couple years since I asked about 900 MHz. Has there been any change in the status at Gold Mtn?
It's only deployed @ Gold Mtn. It doesn't work very far, due to the low gain nature of 900MHz antennas and only using 1/2 W transmitter. Feel free to link to it @ 915MHz with 5MHz channel-width. You'll need the Mikrotik 9HPn modem and a vpol antenna of some kind. More gain the better.
Thanks, Bill _______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
If I can get equipment I'd love to try to shoot it from Tulalip Bay. -Joe -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, +1 (360) 474-7474 On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 8:49 PM Rob Salsgiver <rob@nr3o.com> wrote:
Gold's 900 is up and running - in fact we were just debating it a bit on the list a week or so ago, discussing whether anyone was actively using it and/or interested in experimenting with it, or whether to scrap it and take it offline. Mikrotik no longer makes a radio to use 900, so if we want to work with it we'll have to look at alternatives. There's a MT baseboard with a ubiquity daughterboard that Spokane folks are using we can look at.
What is your interest in 900 and where would you like to see it go? I think the project has some value for some of the non-LOS sites at a lower data rate, but do we have enough people interested to make it worth the effort is the question?
Cheers, Rob
-----Original Message----- From: PSDR [mailto:psdr-bounces@hamwan.org] On Behalf Of Bill Vodall Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 7:47 PM To: Puget Sound Data Ring Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz
It's been a couple years since I asked about 900 MHz. Has there been any change in the status at Gold Mtn?
It's only deployed @ Gold Mtn. It doesn't work very far, due to the low gain nature of 900MHz antennas and only using 1/2 W transmitter. Feel free to link to it @ 915MHz with 5MHz channel-width. You'll need the Mikrotik 9HPn modem and a vpol antenna of some kind. More gain the better.
Thanks, Bill _______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
What is your interest in 900 and where would you like to see it go?
I'm looking to take the next step in higher speed data and it looks like the added range from 900 MHz is the place to go. If the speed and bandwidth is cranked down - and a reasonable antenna used - it should be possible to get some range out of the units. Not as much as the UDRX would have given but significantly more than 2.4 or 5.9 GHz. It appears Ubiquity units are still available and not terribly expensive. They are supported with OpenWRT (AREDN) so it'll be flexible for experimentation. Might even be some for sale at SeaPac next weekend. Units I'm looking at now: * Nano Station Loco - https://amzn.to/2we6VvV * Rocket - https://amzn.to/2wh1zA6 I may not have to get anything new. There's some Metriocom units to check out first. It's a dead end in the future but certainly worth checking out now. Is the unit on Gold using the proprietary NV2 or a more standard WIFI? If conventional WiFi then there are more opportunities to listen for it and possibly connect. 73 Bill
Cheers, Rob
-----Original Message----- From: PSDR [mailto:psdr-bounces@hamwan.org] On Behalf Of Bill Vodall Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 7:47 PM To: Puget Sound Data Ring Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz
It's been a couple years since I asked about 900 MHz. Has there been any change in the status at Gold Mtn?
It's only deployed @ Gold Mtn. It doesn't work very far, due to the low gain nature of 900MHz antennas and only using 1/2 W transmitter. Feel free to link to it @ 915MHz with 5MHz channel-width. You'll need the Mikrotik 9HPn modem and a vpol antenna of some kind. More gain the better.
Thanks, Bill _______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
The 900 MHz noise floor is pretty bad around the populated areas. Lots of utility's use it now. The narrower the better. Steve N0FPF On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:41 AM Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@gmail.com> wrote:
What is your interest in 900 and where would you like to see it go?
I'm looking to take the next step in higher speed data and it looks like the added range from 900 MHz is the place to go. If the speed and bandwidth is cranked down - and a reasonable antenna used - it should be possible to get some range out of the units. Not as much as the UDRX would have given but significantly more than 2.4 or 5.9 GHz.
It appears Ubiquity units are still available and not terribly expensive. They are supported with OpenWRT (AREDN) so it'll be flexible for experimentation. Might even be some for sale at SeaPac next weekend.
Units I'm looking at now: * Nano Station Loco - https://amzn.to/2we6VvV * Rocket - https://amzn.to/2wh1zA6
I may not have to get anything new. There's some Metriocom units to check out first. It's a dead end in the future but certainly worth checking out now.
Is the unit on Gold using the proprietary NV2 or a more standard WIFI? If conventional WiFi then there are more opportunities to listen for it and possibly connect.
73 Bill
Cheers, Rob
-----Original Message----- From: PSDR [mailto:psdr-bounces@hamwan.org] On Behalf Of Bill Vodall Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 7:47 PM To: Puget Sound Data Ring Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz
It's been a couple years since I asked about 900 MHz. Has there been any change in the status at Gold Mtn?
It's only deployed @ Gold Mtn. It doesn't work very far, due to the
low
gain nature of 900MHz antennas and only using 1/2 W transmitter. Feel free to link to it @ 915MHz with 5MHz channel-width. You'll need the Mikrotik 9HPn modem and a vpol antenna of some kind. More gain the better.
Thanks, Bill _______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
-- Pardon the brevity, sent from a mobile device.
On 5/23/19 12:57 PM, Steve wrote:
The 900 MHz noise floor is pretty bad around the populated areas. Lots of utility's use it now.
The narrower the better.
If it's just a ptp use, a M2 yagi will help. Also, there are radios from the mid 2000's mabe by alvarion: https://www.ebay.com/itm/162895142474 They are a 2 mhz channel and will do about 1.5 Mbit/s and 550 packets/sec. It's not a lot but if it's behind trees, it's just fine for a link or a few phones. 73's -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net
As a data point, we tried a 900 Mhz. PTP data link from the Gold site to Federal Way (WA7DAD QTH) about 11 years ago. The noise level was pretty good at Gold, and the two radios with Yagis would see each other, but no solid link. I think it was about 22 miles. ------------------------------ John D. Hays Kingston, WA K7VE
Another thing to mention about 900MHz usage is that it's very close to really powerful paging / cell systems. We had to use an 8-cavity super-narrow bandpass filter to make the 900MHz installation @ Gold Mtn work. The initial deploy didn't use said filter, and the adjacent QRM was so bad that I couldn't even connect to the AP from the base of the tower! I have several more filters in stock to support any possible future site deployments. In my surveys, I haven't observed the high in-band noise floor that others are reporting. Due to the lower gain and directivity of 900MHz antennas, the signal levels are low, and higher power would be useful. Sadly, 900MHz bidirectional amplifiers are still prohibitively expensive. If I recall correctly, the math models I did for 900MHz mobile coverage required something like 500W peak amplifier performance to get decent data rates. Sad to hear about the EOL of the 9HPn. :( In light of that news, it probably makes sense to re-work that system with available gear, such as UBNT. --Bart On 5/23/2019 10:03 AM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 5/23/19 12:57 PM, Steve wrote:
The 900 MHz noise floor is pretty bad around the populated areas. Lots of utility's use it now.
The narrower the better. If it's just a ptp use, a M2 yagi will help.
Also, there are radios from the mid 2000's mabe by alvarion: https://www.ebay.com/itm/162895142474 They are a 2 mhz channel and will do about 1.5 Mbit/s and 550 packets/sec. It's not a lot but if it's behind trees, it's just fine for a link or a few phones.
73's
To back up my claims of low noise floor, here's 5 minutes of airtime sampled from a 900MHz antenna @ Haystack, aimed roughly at Everett (287 degrees): I don't use this system anymore, so I'm making it available for HamWAN experimentation for the next few weeks/months. To use it: Modem: Rocket M900 / M9, or compatible, dual-polarity MIMO. Antenna: https://www.ui.com/airmax/airmax-yagi-antenna/ SSID: HamWAN Frequency: 917MHz Bandwidth: 5MHz Mode: AirMAX TDMA Security: None IP: DHCP Please let me know if you're attempting to connect, regardless of success or failure, as both results are useful. --Bart On 5/23/2019 10:16 AM, Bart Kus wrote:
Another thing to mention about 900MHz usage is that it's very close to really powerful paging / cell systems. We had to use an 8-cavity super-narrow bandpass filter to make the 900MHz installation @ Gold Mtn work. The initial deploy didn't use said filter, and the adjacent QRM was so bad that I couldn't even connect to the AP from the base of the tower! I have several more filters in stock to support any possible future site deployments.
In my surveys, I haven't observed the high in-band noise floor that others are reporting.
Due to the lower gain and directivity of 900MHz antennas, the signal levels are low, and higher power would be useful. Sadly, 900MHz bidirectional amplifiers are still prohibitively expensive. If I recall correctly, the math models I did for 900MHz mobile coverage required something like 500W peak amplifier performance to get decent data rates.
Sad to hear about the EOL of the 9HPn. :( In light of that news, it probably makes sense to re-work that system with available gear, such as UBNT.
--Bart
On 5/23/2019 10:03 AM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 5/23/19 12:57 PM, Steve wrote:
The 900 MHz noise floor is pretty bad around the populated areas. Lots of utility's use it now.
The narrower the better. If it's just a ptp use, a M2 yagi will help.
Also, there are radios from the mid 2000's mabe by alvarion: https://www.ebay.com/itm/162895142474 They are a 2 mhz channel and will do about 1.5 Mbit/s and 550 packets/sec. It's not a lot but if it's behind trees, it's just fine for a link or a few phones.
73's
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
I tried using the Canopy system at 900mhz. Just three miles, nada. Canopy is wide band, but I still expected a link. Then I looked at the spectrum and it was BAD in downtown. Steve On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:03 AM Bart Kus <me@bartk.us> wrote:
To back up my claims of low noise floor, here's 5 minutes of airtime sampled from a 900MHz antenna @ Haystack, aimed roughly at Everett (287 degrees):
I don't use this system anymore, so I'm making it available for HamWAN experimentation for the next few weeks/months. To use it:
Modem: Rocket M900 / M9, or compatible, dual-polarity MIMO. Antenna: https://www.ui.com/airmax/airmax-yagi-antenna/ SSID: HamWAN Frequency: 917MHz Bandwidth: 5MHz Mode: AirMAX TDMA Security: None IP: DHCP
Please let me know if you're attempting to connect, regardless of success or failure, as both results are useful.
--Bart
On 5/23/2019 10:16 AM, Bart Kus wrote:
Another thing to mention about 900MHz usage is that it's very close to really powerful paging / cell systems. We had to use an 8-cavity super-narrow bandpass filter to make the 900MHz installation @ Gold Mtn work. The initial deploy didn't use said filter, and the adjacent QRM was so bad that I couldn't even connect to the AP from the base of the tower! I have several more filters in stock to support any possible future site deployments.
In my surveys, I haven't observed the high in-band noise floor that others are reporting.
Due to the lower gain and directivity of 900MHz antennas, the signal levels are low, and higher power would be useful. Sadly, 900MHz bidirectional amplifiers are still prohibitively expensive. If I recall correctly, the math models I did for 900MHz mobile coverage required something like 500W peak amplifier performance to get decent data rates.
Sad to hear about the EOL of the 9HPn. :( In light of that news, it probably makes sense to re-work that system with available gear, such as UBNT.
--Bart
On 5/23/2019 10:03 AM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 5/23/19 12:57 PM, Steve wrote:
The 900 MHz noise floor is pretty bad around the populated areas. Lots of utility's use it now.
The narrower the better.
If it's just a ptp use, a M2 yagi will help.
Also, there are radios from the mid 2000's mabe by alvarion: https://www.ebay.com/itm/162895142474 They are a 2 mhz channel and will do about 1.5 Mbit/s and 550 packets/sec. It's not a lot but if it's behind trees, it's just fine for a link or a few phones.
73's
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
-- Pardon the brevity, sent from a mobile device.
I tried using the Canopy system at 900mhz. Just three miles, nada. Canopy is wide band, but I still expected a link. Then I looked at the spectrum and it was BAD in downtown.
But that was like a hundred years ago... Hmmm. The RTL-SDR and better SDR solutions generally cover the 900 MHz band. It should be possible to get an idea just what the local noise issues are. Bill
Always worth a try, with a beer in hand! Steve N0FPF On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:14 AM Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@gmail.com> wrote:
I tried using the Canopy system at 900mhz. Just three miles, nada. Canopy is wide band, but I still expected a link. Then I looked at the spectrum and it was BAD in downtown.
But that was like a hundred years ago...
Hmmm. The RTL-SDR and better SDR solutions generally cover the 900 MHz band. It should be possible to get an idea just what the local noise issues are.
Bill _______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
-- Pardon the brevity, sent from a mobile device.
Professionally, had some luck with this: http://www.4rf.com/ 900 Mhz P to P.. we proved it works over a 78mi path… max throughput is 650Kb Thanks, Jamie Hughes WA7JH Mobile: (360) 340-8886<tel:+13603408886> From: PSDR <psdr-bounces@hamwan.org> On Behalf Of Steve Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 11:16 AM To: Puget Sound Data Ring <psdr@hamwan.org> Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz Always worth a try, with a beer in hand! Steve N0FPF On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:14 AM Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@gmail.com<mailto:wa7nwp@gmail.com>> wrote:
I tried using the Canopy system at 900mhz. Just three miles, nada. Canopy is wide band, but I still expected a link. Then I looked at the spectrum and it was BAD in downtown.
But that was like a hundred years ago... Hmmm. The RTL-SDR and better SDR solutions generally cover the 900 MHz band. It should be possible to get an idea just what the local noise issues are. Bill _______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org<mailto:PSDR@hamwan.org> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr -- Pardon the brevity, sent from a mobile device.
Low band width can work...did a studio to transmitter control link from down town 30 miles at 900 MHz, 128k . Worked fine for years. But everyone feels the need for speed! Steve On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:20 AM Jamie Hughes <wa7jh@outlook.com> wrote:
Professionally, had some luck with this:
900 Mhz P to P.. we proved it works over a 78mi path… max throughput is 650Kb
Thanks,
*Jamie Hughes*
WA7JH
Mobile: (360) 340-8886 <+13603408886>
*From:* PSDR <psdr-bounces@hamwan.org> *On Behalf Of * Steve *Sent:* Thursday, May 23, 2019 11:16 AM *To:* Puget Sound Data Ring <psdr@hamwan.org> *Subject:* Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz
Always worth a try, with a beer in hand!
Steve N0FPF
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:14 AM Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@gmail.com> wrote:
I tried using the Canopy system at 900mhz. Just three miles, nada. Canopy is wide band, but I still expected a link. Then I looked at the spectrum and it was BAD in downtown.
But that was like a hundred years ago...
Hmmm. The RTL-SDR and better SDR solutions generally cover the 900 MHz band. It should be possible to get an idea just what the local noise issues are.
Bill _______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
--
Pardon the brevity, sent from a mobile device. _______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
-- Pardon the brevity, sent from a mobile device.
Always worth a try, with a beer in hand!
Amazon Prime strikes again.. https://amzn.to/2K0rsfy This will be a good introduction to the gear and the band. I can't afford 3 today - but one at a time over the next few months slips in under the radar. There's better gear available but probably not at this price and supported by OpenWRT so it's open'ish... As for discussing the results over a beer - see you at the haunted Bridge Tender in Seaside next weekend.
Understand their are some hams in Texas experimenting with 802.11 (5mHz) on 420 mHz. Believe they are in the two 6mHz TV sections of the band. de.Bill.w7kxb . . ________________________________ From: PSDR <psdr-bounces@hamwan.org> on behalf of Stan <kf7ltt@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:08 PM To: psdr@hamwan.org Subject: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz if this is up and running, I'd sure like to buy a 900 Mhz modem and get the HamWan a bit farther into Mason County. Any suggestions? -- Stan KF7LTT Spams/Scams Forwarded To WA State Attorney For Prosecution. _______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net<http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr> mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
Bill, I have a hard time seeing how that would be legal on the 70cm band, considering the FCC sets a symbol rate limit of 56kbaud. If they've managed to make wifi gear fit that requirement, I'd certainly be interested to hear about it. Nigel
Understand their are some hams in Texas experimenting with 802.11 (5mHz) on 420 mHz. Believe they are in the two 6mHz TV sections of the band.
de.Bill.w7kxb . .
________________________________ From: PSDR <psdr-bounces@hamwan.org> on behalf of Stan <kf7ltt@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:08 PM To: psdr@hamwan.org Subject: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz
if this is up and running, I'd sure like to buy a 900 Mhz modem and get the HamWan a bit farther into Mason County.
Any suggestions?
-- Stan KF7LTT Spams/Scams Forwarded To WA State Attorney For Prosecution.
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net<http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr> mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
The 56 ksymbols and 100 Khz bandwidth applies per carrier. http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2016/97/305/ http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2016/97/307/ para (f) sub para (6) and (8) On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Nigel Vander Houwen <nigel@nigelvh.com> wrote:
Bill, I have a hard time seeing how that would be legal on the 70cm band, considering the FCC sets a symbol rate limit of 56kbaud. If they've managed to make wifi gear fit that requirement, I'd certainly be interested to hear about it.
Nigel
Understand their are some hams in Texas experimenting with 802.11 (5mHz) on 420 mHz. Believe they are in the two 6mHz TV sections of the band.
de.Bill.w7kxb . .
________________________________ From: PSDR <psdr-bounces@hamwan.org> on behalf of Stan <kf7ltt@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:08 PM To: psdr@hamwan.org Subject: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz
if this is up and running, I'd sure like to buy a 900 Mhz modem and get the HamWan a bit farther into Mason County.
Any suggestions?
-- Stan KF7LTT Spams/Scams Forwarded To WA State Attorney For Prosecution.
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net<http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr> mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
-- ------------------------------ John D. Hays Edmonds, WA K7VE <http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
I suspect their testing under an Experimental License. I'll search around to find where I read that item and pass it on. de.Bill.w7kxb . . ________________________________ From: PSDR <psdr-bounces@hamwan.org> on behalf of Nigel Vander Houwen <nigel@nigelvh.com> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 9:14 AM To: Puget Sound Data Ring Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz Bill, I have a hard time seeing how that would be legal on the 70cm band, considering the FCC sets a symbol rate limit of 56kbaud. If they've managed to make wifi gear fit that requirement, I'd certainly be interested to hear about it. Nigel
Understand their are some hams in Texas experimenting with 802.11 (5mHz) on 420 mHz. Believe they are in the two 6mHz TV sections of the band.
de.Bill.w7kxb . .
________________________________ From: PSDR <psdr-bounces@hamwan.org> on behalf of Stan <kf7ltt@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:08 PM To: psdr@hamwan.org Subject: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz
if this is up and running, I'd sure like to buy a 900 Mhz modem and get the HamWan a bit farther into Mason County.
Any suggestions?
-- Stan KF7LTT Spams/Scams Forwarded To WA State Attorney For Prosecution.
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net<http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr> mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net<http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr> PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net<http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr> mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net<http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr> mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net<http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr> mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
Yes, find out. That would be great! Steve M N0FPF
On Dec 16, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Bill. W7KXB <W7KXB@msn.com> wrote:
I suspect their testing under an Experimental License. I'll search around to find where I read that item and pass it on. de.Bill.w7kxb . .
From: PSDR <psdr-bounces@hamwan.org> on behalf of Nigel Vander Houwen <nigel@nigelvh.com> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 9:14 AM To: Puget Sound Data Ring Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz
Bill, I have a hard time seeing how that would be legal on the 70cm band, considering the FCC sets a symbol rate limit of 56kbaud. If they've managed to make wifi gear fit that requirement, I'd certainly be interested to hear about it.
Nigel
Understand their are some hams in Texas experimenting with 802.11 (5mHz) on 420 mHz. Believe they are in the two 6mHz TV sections of the band.
de.Bill.w7kxb . .
________________________________ From: PSDR <psdr-bounces@hamwan.org> on behalf of Stan <kf7ltt@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 5:08 PM To: psdr@hamwan.org Subject: [HamWAN PSDR] HamWan 900 MHz
if this is up and running, I'd sure like to buy a 900 Mhz modem and get the HamWan a bit farther into Mason County.
Any suggestions?
-- Stan KF7LTT Spams/Scams Forwarded To WA State Attorney For Prosecution.
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net<http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr> PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr PSDR Info Page - mail.hamwan.net mail.hamwan.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the PSDR Archives. Using PSDR: To post a message to all the list members, send email to ...
_______________________________________________ PSDR mailing list PSDR@hamwan.org http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
participants (12)
-
Bart Kus -
Bill Vodall -
Bill. W7KXB -
Bryan Fields -
Jamie Hughes -
Joe Hamelin -
John D. Hays -
Nigel Vander Houwen -
Rob Salsgiver -
Stan -
Steve -
steve monsey